Application Virtualization comparison & reviews

Summary
Rank
3rd 4th 2nd
Score
0%
0%
User Reviews
Question?
Not Enabled Not Enabled Not Enabled
Analysis expand by Rory Monaghan by Rory Monaghan by Rory Monaghan
Select All
General expand
0%
0%
0%
  • Fully Supported
  • Limitation
  • Not Supported
  • Information Only
Pros
  • + Integration with App Volumes and Horizon. Next to App-V, it's the most widely used product.
  • + Wide range of 3rd party product support for packaging. Focus on accessibility for software developers. Promoted by Microsoft as their future solution.
  • + Has the most options for deployment with MSI, portable exe, Streaming from TubroServer, Using the TurboHub or integrated with LANDesk's ESD.
  • + Some apps launch in the browser and Turbo.net plugin is also now supported macOs, iOS and Android.
  • + You can isolate the network stack
Cons
  • - Though packaging is pretty streamlined and relatively simple with a series of text files, making updates to large applications requires recompiling the .exe which can take a long time. Development was pretty slow and this was the last product to support 64-bit applications. Newer versions of Office or new Windows Operating System have limited functionality.
  • - Relatively low success rate. Steep learning curve for the product. Package mitigations require 3rd party products or use of Package Support Framework which is geared more toward developers than IT Pros.
  • - Small online community. Packaging and troubleshooting with the various levels of isolation requires skill.
  Content  
  •  
Solution Summary
  •  
Content Creator
  •  
Vendor Specialist
  Assessment  
  •  
Maturity
  Support Status  
  •  
Product is supported (Not End Of Life )
  •  
Under active development
  Maturity  
  •  
Proven technology
  •  
Public enterprise references in Europe
  •  
Public enterprise references in US
  •  
Official training classes available
  •  
Official Certification program: VUE/Prometric