Application Virtualization comparison & reviews

Summary
Rank
1st 2nd 7th
Score
0%
0%
User Reviews
Question?
Ask a question Not Enabled Not Enabled
Analysis expand by Rory Monaghan by Rory Monaghan by Rory Monaghan
Select All
General expand
0%
0%
0%
  • Fully Supported
  • Limitation
  • Not Supported
  • Information Only
Pros
  • + Highest rate of app compatibility of all virtualization products. The simplest packaging of all products, very little skill required. Native support for drivers. Ability to control isolation or integration of individual files and reg keys. Citrix Ready and SCCM Integrated. Has powershell cmdlets for automation.
  • + Has the most options for deployment with MSI, portable exe, Streaming from TubroServer, Using the TurboHub or integrated with LANDesk's ESD.
  • + Some apps launch in the browser and Turbo.net plugin is also now supported macOs.
  • + You can isolate the network stack
  • + Integrated nicely with Citrix XenApp 6.5. Had a great file, registry and directory redirection feature.
Cons
  • - Doesn\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'t have a very large online community outside of Software2\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s recipe library which is not free.
  • - Small online community. Packaging and troubleshooting with the various levels of isolation requires skill.
  • - Has been EOL for so long. Missing basic features like Windows10 support.
  Content  
  •  
Solution Summary
  •  
Content Creator
  •  
Vendor Specialist
  Assessment  
  •  
Maturity
  Support Status  
  •  
Product is supported (Not End Of Life )
Has been EOL for some time. Citrix provide native App-V integration
  •  
Under active development
  Maturity  
  •  
Proven technology
  •  
Public enterprise references in Europe
  •  
Public enterprise references in US