Blockchain for Enterprise comparison & reviews

Summary
Rank
5th 1st 6th
Score
0%
0%
User Reviews
Question?
Not Enabled Not Enabled Not Enabled
Analysis expand by MLG Blockchain by MLG Blockchain by MLG Blockchain
Select All
Information expand
0%
0%
0%
  • Fully Supported
  • Limitation
  • Not Supported
  • Information Only
Pros
  • + Large development community
  • + Quick to develop applications on
  • + Wide array of use cases
  • + Can support effective private networks
  • + Built for enterprise implementations
  • + Strong, professional backing of contributors
  • + Developing quickly with lots of capital and community presence
  • + Positioned well in the Entertainment Space as the market leader
  • + Development focus is for large commercial adoption
Cons
  • - Public blockchain creates security concerns
  • - Uses cryptocurrency as fuel for transactions
  • - Forks can cause complications
  • - Only centralized aspect is the Certificate Authority (CA) who issues certificates to eligible parties
  • - Support dependent on IBM’s help centre
  • - Still relatively young in development
  • - Still a while before large scale viability
  • - Controversey with copying Ethereum's platform
  • - Not targeted for Private Enterprise use
  Content  
  •  
Overview
Generic, open-source,  blockchain based distributed computing platform for applications to be built upon.
Modular blockchain platform architecture allowing plug-and-play implementations of various functions. Hosts any mainstream language for smart contract development.
The Tron Protocol aims to host entertainment applications and digital content on a decentralized platform fuelled by the TRX token economy. Developed originally on the Ethereum protocol, Tron has invested significant development effort to create their own, scalable protocol and launch their main net in June 2018.
Applications expand
0%
0%
0%
  Crypto Assets  
  •  
Cryptocurrency
Ether (ETH)
None
Tron (TRX)
  Logic  
  •  
Smart Contract Functionality
Yes
Yes
Yes
Support expand
0%
0%
0%
  Providers  
  •  
% Providers with experience
0.93
0.93
no data
  Community  
  •  
Size of Developer Team
Large
Large
Large in house team
  •  
Support Team / Community
Large
Large. IBM has a direct support line.
Modearte. Some developer resources on Wiki and GitHub. Active telegram group.
  •  
Partnerships / Alliances / Size
EEA - 150+ companies
200+
Moderate
  Updates  
  •  
Frequency of Updates
High
Quarterly
Moderate
  •  
Future Planned Work
v3.5
V1.2
Great Voyage 2020-2021: focus on ICO capabilities, dividend payments, managing supporters and measuring income.
Assessment expand
0%
0%
0%
  General  
  •  
Maturity
Live first in July 2015 (first public blockchain)

First stable release March 2016
First release: July 2017


TRON ICO: August 2017
TRON testnet: March 2018
TRON mainnet: June 2018
  •  
Governance
Ethereum Developers
Linux Foundation - Hyperledger Project Contributors
TRON Foundation. TRON Super Representatives upon main net launch
  •  
Enterprise Focus
Moderate Focus. Through forks, Quorum and Enterprise Ethereum Alliance
Strong Focus
Not enterprise focused, but has the capabilities to support adoption
  •  
Production Ready
Yes
Yes
No
  •  
Website
Link
Link
Link
Architecture expand
0%
0%
0%
  Security  
  •  
Security model
No data encryption or channel partition and is public.

Merkle Patricia Trie Data structure
Membership Service Provider - pluggable interface that supports customizable credential architectures and certificate authorities

Concrete identity format
User credential validation
User credential revocation
Signature generation and verification
Public Blockchain with security features built in.

Lamport digital signature algorithm. Claims to be resistant to quantum computer attacks.

Customized P2P network with data storage encryption, location transparency, source nontraceability

Merkle Patricia Trie data structure
  •  
Permissions
Permissionless
Consortium

Permissioned, private network.

Permissionless
  •  
Privacy
Limited (zk-SNARKs, Ring signatures)
Private Channels
Based on zero knowledge proof. Hides the send, receipt address and transfer amount.
  Algorithms  
  •  
Consensus
PoW & PoS
Multiple options:

Pluggable Framework
No-op (no consensus)
PBFT
Fast Paxos PoS variant.

The consensus of TRON adopts a three-step strategy.
  Efficiency  
  •  
Transaction Time
Moderate
Varies
Moderate
  •  
Block Confirmation Time
~12 blocks
Varies
Fast
  Development  
  •  
Proprietary Codebase
Open Source
Open Source
Open source but goverened by the TRON organization
  General  
  •  
Blockchain / DLT type
Public with Private Forks
Federated / Consortium, Permissioned Network
Public
  •  
Modularity
Generic, with DApp and Smart Contract support for wider applications
Modular Architecture is a core focus of Platform
Similar to Ethereum:
Generic, with DApp and Smart Contract support for wider applications
  •  
Scalability
limited by PoW

currently supports a maximum of 15 TPS
1000 TPS capacity for now. Developed with scaling in mind. Provides flexibility in size and throughput depending on the implementation.

A Performance and Scalability Workgroup exists within the community to discuss, research, and identify key use cases and metrics for all blockchains.
Currently supports 15 TPS as it is on the Ethereum platform. Will be able to support up to 1000 TPS once main net launches
  •  
Storage Capacity
Varies
500 transactions per block
Varies
TCO expand
0%
0%
0%
  Utilities  
  •  
Energy Consumption
Low
Varies
Low - Moderate
  Change Management  
  •  
Ease of Integration in Legacy Systems
Hard
Varies
Hard
  •  
Difficulty to Use
Moderate
Low-Moderate
Moderate
  Maintenance  
  •  
Required ongoing Support
Yes
Yes
Yes
  Pricing  
  •  
Cost to Use
Low
Free
Low
Integration expand
0%
0%
0%
  Licensing  
  •  
Licensing
Varous licenses for different parts of code
Apache 2.0
GPL
  industry focus  
  •  
Industry
Cross-industry
Industry Agnostic
Entertainment Industry. Focused on consumer dApps.
  Developers  
  •  
Development Environment (Languages/SDKs)
Golang, C++, Rust, Python, Solidity
Golang, Java, NodeJS, Python
Java, Scala, C++, Python, Go
  Third Party Support  
  •  
API Support
Yes
Yes
In Development
Market Presence expand
0%
0%
0%
  Engagements  
  •  
% share of engagements
0.52
0.12
no data
  Uses  
  •  
Number of Use Cases / Implementations
Large
Large
Moderate
  Industry Focus  
  •  
Retail
No
Yes
No
  •  
Finance
No
Yes
No
  •  
Logistics
No
Yes
No
  •  
Health Care
No
Yes
No
  •  
Government
No
Yes
No
  •  
Agriculture
No
Yes
No
  •  
Entertainment
Yes
Yes
Yes
  •  
Automotive
No
Yes
No

Matrix Score

  •  
  •  
  • Ethereum Foundation
  • The Linux Foundation
  • TRON Foundation
  •  
  • 5 th
  • 1 st
  • 6 th
X
Login to access your personal profile

Forgot your Password?
X
Signup with linkedin
X

Registered, but not activated? click here (resend activation link)

Login to access your personal profile

Receive new comparison alerts

Show me as community member

I agree to your Terms of services

GDPR