Blockchain for Enterprise comparison & reviews

Summary
Rank
6th 5th 1st
Score
0%
0%
User Reviews
Question?
Not Enabled Not Enabled Not Enabled
Analysis expand by MLG Blockchain by MLG Blockchain by MLG Blockchain
Select All
Information expand
0%
0%
0%
  • Fully Supported
  • Limitation
  • Not Supported
  • Information Only
Pros
  • + Developing quickly with lots of capital and community presence
  • + Positioned well in the Entertainment Space as the market leader
  • + Development focus is for large commercial adoption
  • + Large development community
  • + Quick to develop applications on
  • + Wide array of use cases
  • + Can support effective private networks
  • + Built for enterprise implementations
  • + Applies the hyperledger fabric to its business focused application
Cons
  • - Still a while before large scale viability
  • - Controversey with copying Ethereum's platform
  • - Not targeted for Private Enterprise use
  • - Public blockchain creates security concerns
  • - Uses cryptocurrency as fuel for transactions
  • - Forks can cause complications
  • - Only centralized aspect is the Certificate Authority (CA) who issues certificates to eligible parties
  • - Support dependent on IBM’s help centre
  • - Still relatively young in development
  Content  
  •  
Overview
The Tron Protocol aims to host entertainment applications and digital content on a decentralized platform fuelled by the TRX token economy. Developed originally on the Ethereum protocol, Tron has invested significant development effort to create their own, scalable protocol and launch their main net in June 2018.
Generic, open-source,  blockchain based distributed computing platform for applications to be built upon.
Modular Blockchain Environment using Hyperledger Fabric, delivered via IBM Cloud
Applications expand
0%
0%
0%
  Crypto Assets  
  •  
Cryptocurrency
Tron (TRX)
Ether (ETH)
None
  Logic  
  •  
Smart Contract Functionality
Yes
Yes
Yes
Support expand
0%
0%
0%
  Providers  
  •  
% Providers with experience
no data
0.93
93% (Hyperledger)
  Community  
  •  
Size of Developer Team
Large in house team
Large
Large
  •  
Support Team / Community
Modearte. Some developer resources on Wiki and GitHub. Active telegram group.
Large
Large. IBM has a direct support line.
  •  
Partnerships / Alliances / Size
Moderate
EEA - 150+ companies
Large. Latest: Veridium Labs, Stellar - Generating and Tracking Carbon Credits on the Blockchain
  Updates  
  •  
Frequency of Updates
Moderate
High
Frequent
  •  
Future Planned Work
Great Voyage 2020-2021: focus on ICO capabilities, dividend payments, managing supporters and measuring income.
v3.5
Scale into multiple industries
Assessment expand
0%
0%
0%
  General  
  •  
Maturity
TRON ICO: August 2017
TRON testnet: March 2018
TRON mainnet: June 2018
Live first in July 2015 (first public blockchain)

First stable release March 2016
IBM unveiled its “Blockchain as a Service” offering in March 2017.
  •  
Governance
TRON Foundation. TRON Super Representatives upon main net launch
Ethereum Developers
IBM Proprietary BaaS Platform

Linux Foundation
  •  
Enterprise Focus
Not enterprise focused, but has the capabilities to support adoption
Moderate Focus. Through forks, Quorum and Enterprise Ethereum Alliance
Strong Focus. Major contributor to the Hyperledger Fabric project.
  •  
Production Ready
No
Yes
Yes
  •  
Website
Link
Link
Link
Architecture expand
0%
0%
0%
  Security  
  •  
Security model
Public Blockchain with security features built in.

Lamport digital signature algorithm. Claims to be resistant to quantum computer attacks.

Customized P2P network with data storage encryption, location transparency, source nontraceability

Merkle Patricia Trie data structure
No data encryption or channel partition and is public.

Merkle Patricia Trie Data structure
Similar security models to Hyperledger Fabric, but also incorporates the IBM Cloud Services as an added security layer when using the platform.
  •  
Permissions

Permissionless
Permissionless
Permissioned
  •  
Privacy
Based on zero knowledge proof. Hides the send, receipt address and transfer amount.
Limited (zk-SNARKs, Ring signatures)
Private channels
  Algorithms  
  •  
Consensus
Fast Paxos PoS variant.

The consensus of TRON adopts a three-step strategy.
PoW & PoS
Plugable consensus (PBFT)
  Efficiency  
  •  
Transaction Time
Moderate
Moderate
Varies
  •  
Block Confirmation Time
Fast
~12 blocks
Varies
  Development  
  •  
Proprietary Codebase
Open source but goverened by the TRON organization
Open Source
Hyperledger Fabric is open source. IBM Blockchain is a proprietary layer that sits on top of Hyperledger as a simple to use platform accessing the blockchain
  General  
  •  
Blockchain / DLT type
Public
Public with Private Forks
Federated / Consortium, Permissioned Network
  •  
Modularity
Similar to Ethereum:
Generic, with DApp and Smart Contract support for wider applications
Generic, with DApp and Smart Contract support for wider applications
Plug + Play Architecture

Easy to operate software platform to build out use case, test, and implement
  •  
Scalability
Currently supports 15 TPS as it is on the Ethereum platform. Will be able to support up to 1000 TPS once main net launches
limited by PoW

currently supports a maximum of 15 TPS
Supports 1000 TPS. Designed for high throughput business applications. Scales relative to Hyperledger Fabric new developments.
  •  
Storage Capacity
Varies
Varies
500 transactions per block
TCO expand
0%
0%
0%
  Utilities  
  •  
Energy Consumption
Low - Moderate
Low
Low
  Change Management  
  •  
Ease of Integration in Legacy Systems
Hard
Hard