Blockchain for Enterprise comparison & reviews

Summary
Rank
3rd 5th 2nd
Score
0%
0%
User Reviews
Question?
Not Enabled Not Enabled Not Enabled
Analysis expand Jeff Holek
 		by MLG Blockchain by MLG Blockchain
Select All
Information expand
0%
0%
0%
  • Fully Supported
  • Limitation
  • Not Supported
  • Information Only
Pros
  • + Clear Use Case
  • + Wide Adoption in Finance
  • + Focused service offering that makes it easy to use
  • + Large development community
  • + Quick to develop applications on
  • + Wide array of use cases
  • + Highest number of existing Enterprise use cases than other platforms
  • + Supports IoT and hardware to expand solution set
  • + Significant high profile support
Cons
  • - Speculators can have impact on the cryptocurrency side of the project
  • - Recent controversy with SEC (link in popup)
  • - Early ledger entries are missing
  • - Public blockchain creates security concerns
  • - Uses cryptocurrency as fuel for transactions
  • - Forks can cause complications
  • - Codebase was just released open-source
  • - Still risky as main net is just releasing
  • - Two coin ecosystem and consensus algorithm still a risk as it is untested long-term.
  Content  
  •  
Overview
One of the first commercially viable Finance focused blockchain solutions. Uses 3 core products (xCurrent, xRapid, xVia) in order to facilitate cross border transactions, liquitiy, and payment processing
Generic, open-source,  blockchain based distributed computing platform for applications to be built upon.
VeChains vision is to build a trust-free and distributed business ecosystem that enables transparent information flow, high speed value transfer and efficient collaboration.
Applications expand
0%
0%
0%
  Crypto Assets  
  •  
Cryptocurrency
Ripple (XRP)
Ether (ETH)
VeChain Token (VET) and VeThor Tokens (VTHO)
  Logic  
  •  
Smart Contract Functionality
No
Yes
Yes
Support expand
0%
0%
0%
  Providers  
  •  
% Providers with experience
0.33
0.93
N/A
  Community  
  •  
Size of Developer Team
Moderate
Large
Large
  •  
Support Team / Community
Moderate
Large
Large
  •  
Partnerships / Alliances / Size
Large
EEA - 150+ companies
Large
  Updates  
  •  
Frequency of Updates
Quarterly
High
Frequent
  •  
Future Planned Work
Cobalt Algorithm
v3.5
Main Net Rollout
Assessment expand
0%
0%
0%
  General  
  •  
Maturity
Initially released in 2012. Whitepaper released in 2017 with commercial applications
Live first in July 2015 (first public blockchain)

First stable release March 2016
Token First Available: 2015
First IoT PoC: 2016
Mainnet: June 30 2018
  •  
Governance
Ripple Labs
Ethereum Developers
VeChain Foundation. Multi tiered involving a Steering Board, Advisory Board and a number of committes comprised by the public, and investors in the network.
  •  
Enterprise Focus
Strong focus, as their core product offerings cater to global banking solutions.
Moderate Focus. Through forks, Quorum and Enterprise Ethereum Alliance
Core Focus
  •  
Production Ready
Yes
Yes
Yes
  •  
Website
Website link
Link
Link
Architecture expand
0%
0%
0%
  Security  
  •  
Security model
Transactions are confirmed and validated through validator nodes.
No data encryption or channel partition and is public.

Merkle Patricia Trie Data structure
"Block Security Protocol" (BSP)
  •  
Permissions
Permissioned
Permissionless
Permissioned Aspects
  •  
Privacy
Transaction information on the ledger is public, but payment information is not.
Limited (zk-SNARKs, Ring signatures)
Yes
  Algorithms  
  •  
Consensus
Ripple Protocol Consensus Algorithm

70+ validators
PoW & PoS
Proof of Authority
  Efficiency  
  •  
Transaction Time
Fast
Moderate
No data
  •  
Block Confirmation Time
TBD
~12 blocks
Fast
  Development  
  •  
Proprietary Codebase
Open source with proprietary applications
Open Source
Open source with proprietary applications
  General  
  •  
Blockchain / DLT type
Permissioned Network, Public Architecture
Public with Private Forks
Public
  •  
Modularity
Yes
Generic, with DApp and Smart Contract support for wider applications
Yes
  •  
Scalability
1500 TPS with potential of tens of thousands through Ripple Payment Channels
limited by PoW

currently supports a maximum of 15 TPS
50 - 10,000 TPS
  •  
Storage Capacity
Large
Varies
Depends on implementation
TCO expand
0%
0%
0%
  Utilities  
  •  
Energy Consumption
Low
Low
Medium
  Change Management  
  •  
Ease of Integration in Legacy Systems
Easy
Hard
Easy
  •  
Difficulty to Use
Easy
Moderate
Easy
  Maintenance  
  •  
Required ongoing Support
Low
Yes
Low
  Pricing  
  •  
Cost to Use
Varies
Low
Varies
Integration expand
0%
0%
0%
  Licensing  
  •  
Licensing
ISC
Varous licenses for different parts of code
GNU Lesser General Public License v3.0
  industry focus  
  •  
Industry
Financial Services
Cross-industry
  Developers  
  •  
Development Environment (Languages/SDKs)
C/C++, Java, node.js , Go
Golang, C++, Rust, Python, Solidity
GoLang, C, Solidity, JavaScript, Java, TypeScript
  Third Party Support  
  •  
API Support
Yes
Yes
Yes
Market Presence expand
0%
0%
0%
  Engagements  
  •  
% share of engagements
0.04
0.52
N/A
  Uses  
  •  
Number of Use Cases / Implementations
Large
Large
Large
  Industry Focus  
  •  
Retail
No
No
Yes
  •  
Finance
Yes
No
Yes
  •  
Logistics
No
No
Yes
  •  
Health Care
No
No
Yes
  •  
Government
Yes
No
Yes
  •  
Agriculture
No
No
Yes
  •  
Entertainment
No
Yes
Yes
  •  
Automotive
No
No
Yes

Matrix Score

  •  
  •  
  • Ripple
  • Ethereum Foundation
  • VeChain Foundation
  •  
  • 3 rd
  • 5 th
  • 2 nd
X
Login to access your personal profile

Forgot your Password?
X
Signup with linkedin
X

Registered, but not activated? click here (resend activation link)

Login to access your personal profile

Receive new comparison alerts

Show me as community member

I agree to your Terms of services

GDPR