Blockchain for Enterprise comparison & reviews

Summary
Rank
6th 5th 3rd
Score
0%
0%
User Reviews
Question?
Not Enabled Not Enabled Not Enabled
Analysis expand by MLG Blockchain by MLG Blockchain Jeff Holek
Select All
Information expand
0%
0%
0%
  • Fully Supported
  • Limitation
  • Not Supported
  • Information Only
Pros
  • + Developing quickly with lots of capital and community presence
  • + Positioned well in the Entertainment Space as the market leader
  • + Development focus is for large commercial adoption
  • + Large development community
  • + Quick to develop applications on
  • + Wide array of use cases
  • + Clear Use Case
  • + Wide Adoption in Finance
  • + Focused service offering that makes it easy to use
Cons
  • - Still a while before large scale viability
  • - Controversey with copying Ethereum's platform
  • - Not targeted for Private Enterprise use
  • - Public blockchain creates security concerns
  • - Uses cryptocurrency as fuel for transactions
  • - Forks can cause complications
  • - Speculators can have impact on the cryptocurrency side of the project
  • - Recent controversy with SEC (link in popup)
  • - Early ledger entries are missing
  Content  
  •  
Overview
The Tron Protocol aims to host entertainment applications and digital content on a decentralized platform fuelled by the TRX token economy. Developed originally on the Ethereum protocol, Tron has invested significant development effort to create their own, scalable protocol and launch their main net in June 2018.
Generic, open-source,  blockchain based distributed computing platform for applications to be built upon.
One of the first commercially viable Finance focused blockchain solutions. Uses 3 core products (xCurrent, xRapid, xVia) in order to facilitate cross border transactions, liquitiy, and payment processing
Applications expand
0%
0%
0%
  Crypto Assets  
  •  
Cryptocurrency
Ether (ETH)
  Logic  
  •  
Smart Contract Functionality
Support expand
0%
0%
0%
  Providers  
  •  
% Providers with experience
0.93
0.33
  Community  
  •  
Size of Developer Team
Large in house team
Large
Moderate
  •  
Support Team / Community
Modearte. Some developer resources on Wiki and GitHub. Active telegram group.
Large
Moderate
  •  
Partnerships / Alliances / Size
Moderate
EEA - 150+ companies
Large
  Updates  
  •  
Frequency of Updates
Moderate
High
Quarterly
  •  
Future Planned Work
Great Voyage 2020-2021: focus on ICO capabilities, dividend payments, managing supporters and measuring income.
Cobalt Algorithm
Assessment expand
0%
0%
0%
  General  
  •  
Maturity
TRON ICO: August 2017
TRON testnet: March 2018
TRON mainnet: June 2018
Live first in July 2015 (first public blockchain)

First stable release March 2016
Initially released in 2012. Whitepaper released in 2017 with commercial applications
  •  
Governance
TRON Foundation. TRON Super Representatives upon main net launch
  •  
Enterprise Focus
Not enterprise focused, but has the capabilities to support adoption
Moderate Focus. Through forks, Quorum and Enterprise Ethereum Alliance
Strong focus, as their core product offerings cater to global banking solutions.
  •  
Production Ready
No
Yes
  •  
Website
Link
Link
Website link
Architecture expand
0%
0%
0%
  Security  
  •  
Security model
Public Blockchain with security features built in.

Lamport digital signature algorithm. Claims to be resistant to quantum computer attacks.

Customized P2P network with data storage encryption, location transparency, source nontraceability

Merkle Patricia Trie data structure
No data encryption or channel partition and is public.

Merkle Patricia Trie Data structure
Transactions are confirmed and validated through validator nodes.
  •  
Permissions
Permissionless
Permissioned
  •  
Privacy
Based on zero knowledge proof. Hides the send, receipt address and transfer amount.
Limited (zk-SNARKs, Ring signatures)
Transaction information on the ledger is public, but payment information is not.
  Algorithms  
  •  
Consensus
Fast Paxos PoS variant.

The consensus of TRON adopts a three-step strategy.
PoW & PoS
Ripple Protocol Consensus Algorithm

70+ validators
  Efficiency  
  •  
Transaction Time
Moderate
Fast
  •  
Block Confirmation Time
  Development  
  •  
Proprietary Codebase
Open source but goverened by the TRON organization
Open Source
Open source with proprietary applications
  General  
  •  
Blockchain / DLT type
Public
Public with Private Forks
Permissioned Network, Public Architecture
  •  
Modularity
Similar to Ethereum:
Generic, with DApp and Smart Contract support for wider applications
Generic, with DApp and Smart Contract support for wider applications
Yes
  •  
Scalability
Currently supports 15 TPS as it is on the Ethereum platform. Will be able to support up to 1000 TPS once main net launches
limited by PoW

currently supports a maximum of 15 TPS
1500 TPS with potential of tens of thousands through Ripple Payment Channels
  •  
Storage Capacity
Varies
Varies
Large
TCO expand
0%
0%
0%
  Utilities  
  •  
Energy Consumption
Low - Moderate
Low
Low
  Change Management  
  •  
Ease of Integration in Legacy Systems
Hard
Hard