|
|
|
Security |
|
|
|
|
SGX / PoET
All transactions are signed by known identities.
PoET implementation will depend on that of SGX. SGX is a set of instructions which allows application to run in sectioned-off areas of memory called enclaves. This aims to protect sensitive data and code from disclosure or tampering, both when stored and at runtime. Unfortunately, since Intel first introduced SGX in 2013, several weaknesses have been found in its design.
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/02/01/sgx_secure_until_you_look_at_the_detail/
|
Public Blockchain with security features built in.
Lamport digital signature algorithm. Claims to be resistant to quantum computer attacks.
Customized P2P network with data storage encryption, location transparency, source nontraceability
Merkle Patricia Trie data structure
Although the hash algorithm built into Bitcoin and Ethereum is secure with todays technology from brute force attacks, quantum computing may support enough computational power to compromise these algorithm.
|
Data is only shared between parties involved in the transaction, verifiers, and permissioned observers. This allows an extra layer of security from traditional DLT where the data is spread throughout the network.
|
|
|
|
Permissioned, Permissionless depending on application
Hyperledger Sawtooth supports both permissioned and permissionless blockchain networks. This provides flexibility but lacks the prescriptive level of security hyperledger fabric has.
|
Permissionless
|
Permissioned
|
|
|
|
Configrable permissions for any node cluster within the network
Sawtooth is built to solve the challenges of permissioned (private) networks. Clusters of Sawtooth nodes can be easily deployed with separate permissioning. There is no centralized service that could potentially leak transaction patterns or other confidential information. There is no concept of private channels as seen with Hyperledger fabric
contributors are investigating both trusted execution and zero-knowledge cryptographic approaches
|
Based on zero knowledge proof. Hides the send, receipt address and transfer amount.
Similar in function to the zk-SNARK feature Ethereum added during their Metropolis release.
|
Privacy concerns are addressed through the pluggable uniqueness services, and restriction of viewing transactions.
|
|
|
|
Algorithms |
|
|
|
|
PoET
Dynamic, Pluggable Consensus Algorithms
Sawtooth supports pluggable consensus algorithms but offers their own method —Proof of Elapsed Time (PoET). The PoET consensus has each validating participant wait a random amount of time. The first person to finish waiting becomes the leader of the new block. This provides a secure authority mechanism without the computational race and energy draw of Proof of Work (PoW).
|
Fast Paxos PoS variant.
The consensus of TRON adopts a three-step strategy.
1. Kafka-based technology system: implement a centralized consensus algorithm.
2. Raft-based distributed consensus mechanism: realize the centralized and distributed leapfrogging. Improves network function/distribution and lays the foundation for distribution with no logical center.
3. Consensus mechanism of Proof of Stake and realize the Byzantine Fault Tolerant Consensus.
|
Notaries - Pluggable Framework, Validity consensus and Uniqueness consensus
transaction validity and transaction uniqueness.
https://docs.corda.net/key-concepts-consensus.html
Corda uses special Notary Nodes to reach consensus. Notaries are nodes that specifically address double spend attempts.
|
|
|
|
Efficiency |
|
|
|
|
Fast
Depends on implementation. Processes transactions in parallel to accelerate block creation and validation
|
Moderate
|
Fast
Built for financial applications
|
|
|
Block Confirmation Time
Details
|
Varies
Depends on implementation. Processes transactions in parallel to accelerate block creation and validation
|
Fast
|
TBD
|
|
|
|
Development |
|
|
|
Proprietary Codebase
Details
|
Open Source
|
Open source but goverened by the TRON organization
Built on Ethereum, but planning to move to own main net in June 2018
|
Open Source
|
|
|
|
General |
|
|
|
Blockchain / DLT type
Details
|
Federated / Consortium, Permissioned Network
Federated Blockchains operate under the leadership of a group. As opposed to public Blockchains, they don’t allow any person with access to the Internet to participate in the process of verifying transactions. Federated Blockchains are faster (higher scalability) and provide more transaction privacy - important aspects for Enterprise focused deployments
|
Public
Open source public blockchain fuelled by cryptocurrency.
|
Not a blockchain. Uses DLT to create transaction efficiencies between permissioned parties rather than the same ledger for the entire network, which R3 Corda believes is inefficient.
https://vimeo.com/205410473
|
|
|
|
Modular Architecture. Incorporates IoT Sensors that can broaden the use case.
Location, Temperature, Humidity, Shock, Tilt, Motion, Shock - all examples of data that can be captured.
|
Similar to Ethereum:
Generic, with DApp and Smart Contract support for wider applications
It is not modularity that stands out but the provision of a generic platform suitable for various types of transactions and applications
|
Less focus on modularity
Focus is on financial applications, but may support more use cases in the future.
|
|
|
|
1000 TPS. Built to be scalable in the way that consensus algorithms can be changed, applications are separate from the core system, and transactions can occur in parallel.
The different consensus mechanism features were designed to cater to networks of different sizes and with different requirements. Sawtooth targets large distributed validator populations that do not require much computational power.
|
Currently supports 15 TPS as it is on the Ethereum platform. Will be able to support up to 1000 TPS once main net launches
Scalability is a core feature for TRON. They want to be able to support large commercial projects, while minimizing transactions fees and time.
|
Corda focuses on scaling through reducing inefficiencies in consensus mechanisms. By limiting involvement to just the transacting parties, beneficiaries, and verifiers it aims to position itself as more scalable than PoW
performance considerations https://www.corda.net/2017/12/dlt-performance-considerations/
|
|
|
|
Varies
Depends on implementation
|
Varies
https://tronscan.org/#/blockchain/stats
|
Varies
|
